Wednesday, 12 February 2014

ES 1102 Reader Response second Draft edited from previous drafts

In Lotbiniere (2009) "Malaysia drops English Language teaching" article, he discussed the possible reasons why the government had decided to drop the PPMSI policy and implement a new policy instead. Max showed two sides of a coin, those who supported and those who opposed the policy. One of the reasons given by the government was the existence of English language disparity in terms of rural and urban areas, yet, he mentioned that many suspected the main reason was the government opposition party had given them political pressure by saying that PPSMI compromised malay heritage.



Despite that Max's article was mainly on presenting the current situation of Malaysia's decision, the fact that the students’ results for maths and science had dropped by 2.5%, I do agree with the government’s decision of having English being taught in a separate class. The main reason why the government chose to remove the PPSMI was English and Maths are more technical and it will be easier for students to learn in the language that they are used to. Maths and Science are the main subjects focused on education throughout the world for development and progress of technologies. These are important to Malaysia so that they can catch up with the global economics and hence, it is important for the citizens to have a profound knowledge in these subject areas.

Learning English in a separate subject helps the students to fully understand the technical usage of English correctly. If they learn English to learn Maths and Science, they probably will only know the English technical terms for these subjects. This will still pose a problem when they want to communicate with the speakers from other countries. Having it taught in a separate class, the students can learn how to communicate in English via different mediums like oral and written. After which, it is easier for them to learn how to write scientific papers which then, they are only required to learn certain technical terms in English. Otherwise, they still have to learn the correct way of phrasing and sentence structures. Actually, What matters is how students present their ideas for readers to understand, which is difficult to learn when English is a tool for learning Maths and Science, instead of being treated as another subject. A very good example will be the China’s education system, which managed to develop many global speakers with impressive communication and technical skills. In China, Maths and Science are taught in English as it is the language that the students are most familiar with. This has been proved to be really successful as many chinese students manage to do really well in academics when they study abroad. 

From my personal interactions with my China’s friends, they say that they initally faced communication issues but they rectified it rather fast as they took extra english classes in the British Council and learnt formal English. Therefore, it is easier for students to learn English and Maths in their preferred language and to have English in a separate class. 

2 comments:

  1. How do you cite? Which name do you use? Check the APA guide

    In Max de Lotbiniere's article, Malaysia drops English Language teaching, he discussed aboutRED the possible reasons why the government had decided to drop the PPMSI policy and implement a new policy instead. Max showed two sides of a coin, those who supported and those ^ deniedWRONG WORD the policy. Many reasons were given by the government likeWRONG WORD ^ English langugage disparity in terms of rural and urban areas, yet, he mentioned that many suspected the main reason was the government opposition party had gaveVERB FORM/WRONG WORD them political pressure by saying that PPSMI compromised malay heritage.

    Despite that Max's article was mainly on presenting the current situation of Malaysia's decision, the fact that the students’ results for maths and science had dropped by 2.5%, I do agree with the governmentWORD FORM decision of having English being taught in a separate class. The main reason why the government chose to remove the PPSMI /was are??/ more technical and it will be easier for students to learn in the language that they are used to. Maths and Science are the main subjects focused inWRONG WORD ^ education throughout the world for development and progress of technologies. These are important to Malaysia so that they can catch up with the global economics and hence, it is important for herWW people to have ^ profound knowledge in these subject areas. With learning in their own comfortable?? language, they can understand these subjects better and after all, there will be *translators available in the event of ^ communication barrier. *Who are these translators?

    In addition, learning English in a separate subject helps to?? students to fully understand the technical usage of English correctly. If they learn English to learn Maths and Science, they probably will only know the English technical terms for these subjects. This will still pose a problem when they want to communicate with the speakers from other countries. Having it to be RED taught in a separate class, the students can learn how to communicate in English via different mediums like oral and written. After which, it is easier for them to learn how to write scientific paperWORD FORM which then, only requireVERB FORM them to know certain technical terms in English. Otherwise, they still have to learn the correct way of phrasing and sentence structures. Actually, What matters is how students present their ideas for readers to understand, which is difficult to learn when English is a tool for learning Maths and Science, instead of being treated as another subject. A very good example will be the ChinaWF education ^ , which manageVF to develop many global speakers with impressive communication and technical skills. In China, Maths and Science are taught in English as it is the language that the students are most familiar with. This has been proved to be really successful as many chinese students manage to do really well in academics when they study abroad.
    From my personal interactions with my ChinaWF friends, they say that they initally faced communication issues but they rectified it rather fast as they took extra english classes in ^ British Council and learnt proper?? english. Therefore, it is easier for students to learn tecnicalSP subjects in their comfortable?? language and havingWW English learntRED ^ a separate class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. MaxWHICH NAME SHOULD YOU USE? showed two sides of a coin, those who supported and those who opposed the policy. One of the reasons given by the government was the existence of English language disparity in terms of rural and urban areas, yet, he mentioned that many suspected the main reason was the government opposition party had givenWW them political pressure...


    Despite ^ ^ that Max's article was mainly on presenting the current situation of Malaysia's decision, the fact that the students’ results for maths and science had dropped by 2.5%, ^ ^ ^ I do agree with the government’s decision of having English being taught in a separate class. The main reason why the government chose to remove the PPSMI was English and Maths are more technical and it will be easier for students to learn in the language that they are used to. Maths and Science are the main subjects focused on ^ education throughout the world for development and progress of technologies. These are important to Malaysia so that they can catch up with the global economics and hence, it is important for the citizens to have a profound knowledge in these subject areas.

    ...they say that they initally faced communication issues but they rectified itWW rather fast

    A very good example will be theRED China’s education system, ... In China, Maths and Science are taught in English as it is the language that the students are most familiar with. REALLY!!!

    ReplyDelete